Every member of Congress. What they raised for the 2026 cycle, and how much of it
came from PACs instead of people. Sort it, filter it, check it yourself.
No grades. No adjectives. Just the filings.
#PROOF
$1.14B
Raised this cycle
Sum of 429 filed FEC totals
429 of 532
Have 2026 filings
103 show no 2026-cycle data yet
44
Over 60% PAC-funded
Both parties. Sort the column and see.
124
40–60% PAC-funded
The middle tier
Top 10 states by money raised
New York$121.5M
California$117.5M
Texas$77.0M
Arizona$65.8M
Florida$54.9M
Virginia$52.4M
Pennsylvania$47.0M
Ohio$45.4M
New Jersey$34.3M
Washington$26.3M
What this page will not do. It will not grade anyone, rank anyone as good or bad, or tell you
who to vote for. A high PAC share is not a crime and not an accusation — PACs are the most disclosed
money in politics, which is exactly why it can be counted. What the number tells you is
who a campaign's money came from. What you do with that is your call.
Click any name to open their detail — the money broken down, the voting record,
a real phone number and office address if you want to say something directly, and
direct links to the official records so you can check every number yourself. Don't take our word for it.
The board
Official
State
Party
Raised (2026)
PAC share
From people
Votes cast
Bills
Where the blanks are, and why they stay blank.
103 of 532 members show no 2026-cycle FEC total. That usually means they are not on this
cycle's ballot, or their committee has not filed yet. Those cells read
“not filed” instead of $0, because $0 would say they raised nothing — which is a different
claim, and not one the filings support.
One figure is withheld, on purpose. Rep. Shri Thanedar (MI-13): FEC pull returned a negative total. Under review; not published. The row stays blank rather than guessed.