Language / Idioma

Following the Ricketts Money

A dated timeline of the Ricketts family’s Nebraska political giving, with a link on every row and a label on what I have checked and what I have not.

Posted 2026-09-30 · ~6 minute read — Angel AL The O.G. Mixer, Omaha NE

What I read, and what I could not

The Flatwater Free Press series “Ricketts’ Riches” (Sara Gentzler and Alex Richards, September 19, 2024, with a family-spending follow-up on December 22, 2024) is the backbone of this post. I loaded twelve sources into a research notebook to help me keep them straight, and I asked it questions. What came back is a set of summaries. A summary is a lead, not a source.

So every row below carries one of three labels. Checked means it is already on this site with its own source. Reported, not yet checked means the coverage says it and I have not yet opened the filing or the article myself. Needs a source means I have a claim and no document.

Numbers that do not add up yet

My notes say the family put about $9.8 million into Nebraska campaigns and causes over a decade. This site already prints “at least $18.6 million” over Pete Ricketts’ career, from the December 2024 follow-up. Those are two totals over two windows of time, and I have not confirmed how Flatwater counts each one. Do not add them together, and do not swap one for the other.

Three other dollar figures near the 2022 governor’s race also stay separate: Pete’s own $100,000 to Jim Pillen (Nebraska’s filing), a family total to Pillen in my notes that I have not checked at NADC, and a $1,275,000 figure I looked for in the state’s records and did not find.

The timeline, with links

The rows marked Checked, with more context and their sources, are on One Signature, One Senator and One Ballot, Two Names.

Check it yourself

  1. Open the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission’s search, at nadc.nebraska.gov.
  2. Search the committee names in the timeline, such as “Nebraska Future Action Fund,” and read who gave and who received.
  3. Search the donor’s own name for each cycle. Add up only what the filing shows, and write down the filing period.
  4. For federal giving, use the FEC’s free data at api.open.fec.gov.
  5. Send me the page and line where you found it. If it checks out, the row moves to Checked with your read date.

What I am not printing yet

Not confirmed

The coverage also quotes a political scientist, a former governor and a former U.S. senator describing what the spending meant. Those are their opinions. I will print them once I have read them in the original article, with the date and the outlet.

My notes compare the family with other wealthy donors in Illinois, Florida and North Dakota, using percentages of self-funding. States count giving differently, so I will not print those percentages until I have read how each one was computed.

My notes also say the family has given more than $100 million to federal races since 2005, and give national rankings for Pete’s parents. Those are for the FEC and OpenSecrets to confirm.

The same question, the other direction

This site’s rule is to run the same query on both sides. Pete’s sister, Laura Ricketts, is a documented Democratic donor, and she gave $10,000 to Susanne Shore’s campaign. That is on Shore’s filing. My next homework is to run this same “who funded challengers and ballot measures” search on the biggest Democratic-aligned donors in the same cycles, and to print it next to this one.

What I need from you

My notebook has twelve sources and I cannot tell which one backs which claim. If you have the list, send it. For each “not yet checked” row, the fix is one link and one page number. I will keep this post current, and every change gets a date.

#PROOF — trust, but verify.